413 Reliance Agreements
Standard Operating Procedure 413: Collaborative Projects (Reliance Agreements)
Definitions
Relying IRB: The IRB or Research Ethics Committee that will cede its review to another IRB or equivalent in order to cover the activities of its investigators.
Reviewing IRB: The IRB or Research Ethics Committee that will conduct appropriate ethics review of a human subjects research project on behalf of two or more institutions or organizations.
Reliance Agreement: Often called an Authorization Agreement or Institutional Authorization Agreement, a Reliance Agreement is an agreement entered into by two or more organizations or institutions who are engaged in the same human subjects research project. The Agreement outlines the duties and responsibilities of each of the parties, including the IRB, HRP staff, and the investigators who will complete work on the project.
Investigator: An individual involved in the performance of human subjects research activities who performs one or more of the following activities:
- Obtaining information about or biospecimens from living individuals by intervening or interacting with them for research purposes
- Obtaining identifiable biospecimens or private, identifiable information about a living individual for research purposes
- Obtaining the voluntary informed consent of individuals participating in research
- Studying, interpreting, analyzing, or using identifiable biospecimens or identifiable, private information for research purposes; or
- Communicating with the IRB or other institutional review entity regarding the performance of the research project.
An investigator’s primary concern must be the protection of the rights and welfare of human participants in all research activities. All investigators must be trained and listed on an active protocol prior to carrying out any of the aforementioned activities.
Engagement: When an institution’s employees or agents are involved in human subjects research at a level of involvement that warrants two institutions entering into an agreement. Full guidance on the concept of "engagement" is available from the Office for Human Research Protections. Generally speaking, when a USU Principal Investigator or one of their study staff are:
- The prime recipient of a federal funding award; or
- Obtaining data about research participants through intervention or interaction with them; or
- Accessing private, identifiable private information about the participants; or
- Obtaining the informed consent of participants for the research.
I. Scope
USU Policy 4103 states that the USU IRB shall determine the appropriate site for review of any project that involves a Utah State University investigator. Investigators are not permitted to self-determine the appropriate site for review; that determination must come from either the external sponsor, or via agreement between the appropriate IRBs. In general, the USU IRB will engage in a reliance agreement in order to avoid duplicative review and administrative burden, especially under the circumstances outlined in Section IV, below. However, Utah State University will not engage in Reliance for exempt protocols.
Reliance Agreements are appropriate where an agent of USU is acting as an “investigator” on a project, and that investigator’s activities renders Utah State University “engaged” in the project. Reliance Agreements cannot be executed on behalf of students alone or emeritus faculty alone. Reliance Agreements must be executed on behalf of someone who meets the definition of a Principal Investigator, per SOP 302, and who will oversee the activities taking place under the Reliance Agreement. Emeritus faculty are generally not able to serve as a PI for Reliance Agreements, however. Finally, Reliance Agreements are generally only available where the external investigator is an agent of an institution, organization, or research center that holds its own Federalwide Assurance.
II. Process for Obtaining Reliance – USU is Reviewing IRB
When a protocol will be filed with and reviewed by USU’s Institutional Review Board, prior to seeking review from the USU IRB, the investigators should collaborate with the IRB they hope will become a Relying IRB to ensure that that IRB or HRPP will be amenable to a Reliance Agreement. If not, the research team should work with the USU IRB to determine whether it might be appropriate to shift the site of review so that USU can become the Relying IRB.
Instructions for requesting Reliance are embedded into each individual protocol in Kuali Protocols. Investigators should follow those instructions to properly request a Reliance Agreement, which are represented in the step-guide below:
Is the protocol exempt?
If yes, stop. No Reliance is available. Investigators must each seek exemption from their own IRB.
If no, proceed.
Is the other IRB signed onto SMART IRB?
If yes, see step 3.
If no, see step 4.
Prepare a SMART IRB Letter of Agreement.
The link for a SMART IRB Letter of Agreement is here.
Send the Letter of Agreement to the other site's IRB. Provide them with the protocol materials as well. Ask if they need any additional information for Reliance.
cc irb@usu.edu on your communications; we will send some additional information to them.
Complete the Reliance Agreement Template
Complete the Reliance Agreement Template available within your protocol in Kuali Protocols, but also available here.
Send the proposed Reliance Agreement to the other site's IRB. Provide them with the protocol materials as well. Ask if they need any additional information for Reliance.
cc irb@usu.edu on your communications; we will send some additional information to them.
Submit your Protocol or Amendment
Once you have either: 1) a Reliance Agreement signed by the Relying IRB; or 2) a response from the Relying IRB that they would prefer to wait until the protocol is approved to rely, you may submit your protocol or amendment with that documentation attached to your Non-USU Investigator. Do not submit your protocol or amendment while this is in process with the Relying IRB. The USU IRB cannot move its review forward until it is clear whether Reliance will occur.
USU IRB Will Review Reliance Proposal
During the protocol or amendment review process, the USU IRB will review the Reliance proposal. If everything is in order, the USU IRB will execute the Reliance Agreement during the review process.
Distribute the Agreement to Non-USU Parties
The Reliance Agreement contains information about the responsibilities of the parties. Make sure all parties have a fully executed copy. The fully executed copy will be in Admin Notes & Files upon protocol or amendment approval.
III. Process for Obtaining Reliance – USU is Relying IRB
Utah State University’s IRB will generally engage in a Reliance Agreement for any project for which an investigator is engaged in human subjects research, under the definitions and conditions articulated above. Utah State University’s IRB will supply the Reviewing IRB with details about its local requirements via an Institutional Profile. Instructions for requesting a Reliance Agreement are provided in the step-guide below:
Is the project exempt?
If yes, stop. File an exempt protocol at Utah State University. No Reliance is available.
If no, continue to step 3.
Is USU "engaged"?
If no, no agreements are necessary. Please be sure to meet any requirements of the Reviewing IRB.
If yes, continue to step 4.
A Reliance Agreement is Needed
Submit a Request to Rely on Another IRB's Review in Kuali Protocols.
IV. Addition of Sites to Previously-Approved Protocols
Investigators may add new research sites to a previously-approved protocol through the Amendment process spelled out in SOP 408. Prior to filing an amendment to the approved protocol, the USU Principal Investigator must initiate a Reliance process with the reviewing entity at the new research site, in order to gauge their willingness to rely. Documentation of that review process having been initiated shall be provided in the amendment materials.
V. Accredited vs. Non-Accredited HRPPs
Utah State University will generally rely on the IRB of another institution or organization where that institution or organization’s Human Research Protection Program is accredited by AAHRPP. Accreditation is a signal that the institution or organization has substantially similar review and approval requirements in place, and can be relied upon without further review of the institution’s requirements. Organizations or institutions signed on to SMART IRB undergo a similar program review, and will also be generally relied upon without further review requirements.
If an investigator wishes to request that the USU IRB rely on an institution or organization’s IRB that is not accredited by AAHRPP, the HRP Office must first review their policies, procedures, and current Federalwide Assurance (at a minimum). A thorough review of the protocol materials on file with the other institution must also occur, so that the USU IRB can make requests of that IRB to ensure that USU’s minimum standards for review and approval are being met for all research that USU investigators will engage with. Reliance on a non-accredited IRB is not a guarantee, and may depend on the willingness of the Reviewing IRB to incorporate certain minimum review standards to ensure that USU’s minimum standards are being met.